Systems, methods, and apparatuses for reducing interference at the front-end of a communications receiving device

ABSTRACT

Embodiments of the invention may provide for reducing interference in the front-end of a communications receiver. The cancellation circuitry may be utilized in conjunction with a preliminary rejection filter for improved rejection of out-of-band interference from other radio services or circuitry. The cancellation circuit may be placed in parallel with the preliminary rejection filter and may enhance suppression at the interference frequency by matching the gain and phase of the preliminary rejection filter prior to subtracting the matched signal from the preliminary rejection filter output. The cancellation circuit need not necessary know beforehand the characteristics of the preliminary rejection filter, the interference source, or the coupling mechanism, as it may adapt to unknown or varying interferers by adapting the matching gain and phase values based on the output of the preliminary rejection filter at tap points occurring both before and after application of the cancellation signal.

RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a non-provisional application claimingpriority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/293,319, filed Jan. 8,2010, and entitled “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR REDUCINGINTERFERENCE AT THE FRONT-END OF A COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVING DEVICE”,which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as if fullyset forth herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention relates generally to the field ofcommunications, and more specifically to improving the quality orfidelity of a received signal by suppressing interference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Central to the operation of a radio communications device is receivingan electromagnetic radio frequency (RF) signal and decoding the dataembedded in it. The RF signal can, however, be seriously degraded duringsignal transmission. For instance, the signal strength is attenuated asit travels through air, with the amount of attenuation generallyincreasing with the distance traveled, before consideration ofmulti-path effects. The effect of signal loss is exacerbated by thenoise and interference introduced into the signal along thecommunication path. The noise and interference can be particularlyproblematic when introduced at the receiver where the communicatedsignal is weakest, thereby resulting in lowsignal-to-noise-and-interference ratio (SNIR) conditions and makingsignal decoding difficult. In severe cases with low SNIR levels, thesystem can be prone to making decoding errors.

The problem of electromagnetic interference (EMI) is of interest becauseit can be considerably stronger than other noise sources and can thus bethe dominant system impairment, or in other words, the active constraintlimiting system performance. Such interference can arise from a varietyof sources. One illustrative EMI source is other radio communicationsdevices. As other radio devices transmit RF signals amongst themselves,their RF signals can also be received by other unintended devices. Tothese unintended devices, those RF signals can be nuisance interference.When such unintended signals are strong enough, they can overwhelm thedesired received communications signal.

A second illustrative source of EMI is the communication of data alongbuses or traces, e.g. the sending of electrical signals along conductiveor metal paths embedded in a dielectric, plastic, or other moldingmaterial. When a signal is transmitted at a high speed or high baudrate, a conductive trace or bus can active like antenna and emitelectromagnetic radiation. This radiation may then be absorbed as EMI byan antenna or another bus or trace in the receive path of acommunications device.

The problem of EMI has recently been garnering attention because of itsroot at the conflict between communications performance and prevalenceof use. The use of communications devices and services is experiencing agrowth explosion in services such as WiFi (IEEE 802.11), cognitive radio(IEEE 802.22), mobile phones (e.g. GSM, EDGE, CDMA, W-CDMA, WiMAX, LTE),global positioning service (GPS), Bluetooth, and mobile video (e.g. DVB,DMB, MediaFLO). The concurrent use of two or more of these services inclose proximity, however, can cause one service to interfere withanother. In some instances, multiple services can be supported on thesame device where the physical distance between the radio antennae isvery short (on the order of centimeters apart) or even share the sameantenna such as in a GPS, mobile video, and WiFi enabled 3G mobilephone. On such a device, if a first service such as WiFi or WCDMA istransmitting while a second service such as GPS or DVB-H is receiving,then it can easily be the case where the transmitting first servicesignal is in excess of 10,000 times stronger than the receiving secondservice signal thus corrupting the receiving second service withoverwhelming interference. A number of other illustrative interferencescenarios in commercial applications, though not an exhaustive listing,can be found in the presentation “Performance Analysis and DesignConsiderations for Multi-Radio Platforms” by Waltho et al. delivered atthe 2006 Intel Developers Forum.

The technological advancement of communications devices is being impededby increased interference not only because of the number of radios usedin a confined area but also because of the denser and faster signalrouting in newer communications devices. As previously noted, ahigh-speed signal path can emit EMI that can be absorbed by a nearbyradio receiver. Thus, even on devices where the radios are carefullycontrolled, e.g. there is no concurrent operation of multiple radioservices, the operation of other non-radio aspects of the device duringradio communication may pose a problem. For example, in a camera-enabledmobile phone, a ribbon cable bus between a processor and camera modulemay emit enough EMI to disrupt phone reception resulting in theinterruption of an ongoing call or the missing of an incoming call.

EMI can impede the integration of wireless radio services and othertechnologies involving high-speed signal paths into a single, small formfactor device. Consequently, there have been many efforts to address theproblem of EMI in a communications receiver. Some of the conventionalart has proposed the use of high quality filters to suppress out-of-bandinterferers (i.e., EMI whose frequency spectral coverage is disjointfrom the spectrum utilized by the primary radio communicationsreceiver). Such filters include surface acoustic wave (SAW), bulkacoustic wave (BAW), and film bulk acoustic wave resonator (FBAR)filters. While such filters offer very high suppression of out-of-bandinterferers, their use has at least two significant drawbacks. First,these high-quality filters commonly have undesirably high componentcosts, in terms of dollar pricing. Second, these filters often come asdiscrete components which are not integrated into other existingcomponents on a communications receiver. Thus, their inclusion resultsin an increase in area utilization. Furthermore, the EMI problem issevere enough in many contexts that multiple filters have to be cascadedto provide adequate isolation, thus multiplying the price and area costsassociated with that solution. Many consumer products, such as mobilephones, GPS receivers, and portable digital assistants, are highlysensitive to pricing and physical size and would be more marketableabsent increases in these characteristics.

Another major group of efforts to reduce the impact of EMI are based onthe principle of interference cancellation or suppression. The generalprinciple of interference cancellation in the prior art is illustratedin FIG. 1 where a victim receiver 120, as part of a first radiocommunications system, is operating concurrently with an aggressingtransmitter 110 as part of a second system, and the signal from theaggressing transmitter 110 couples into the receive signal path via thecoupled signal 150. An active cancellation unit 130 samples the outputfrom the aggressing transmitter 110 and applies a transformation (e.g.attenuation, delay, and/or phase shift), to mimic the transformationthat occurs in the coupled signal 150. The victim receiver 120 thensubtracts the output from the active cancellation unit 130 from thecorrupted received signal. The resulting signal then has theinterference removed to the degree that the output of the activecancellation unit 130 models the coupled signal 150.

The prior art in interference cancellation suffers from several majorshortcomings. One significant drawback is the fundamental requirementthat the active cancellation unit 130 senses (or equivalently taps orsplits) the output of the aggressing transmitter 110 as proposed in U.S.Pat. No. 6,539,204 by Marsh and Sutton, U.S. Pat. No. 6,915,112 bySutton and Soledade, U.S. Pat. No. 6,745,018 by Zehavi et al., U.S. Pat.No. 7,123,676 by Gebara et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,522,883 by Gebara etal. The model of the coupled interference signal 150 is generated byadjusting the amplitude, phase, and/or delay of the transmitter 110output. Without such a sensing of the aggressing transmitter 110, theactive cancellation unit 130 will not produce a meaningful model of thecoupled interference signal 150, and consequently, will not be able toreduce the interference. However, such a sensing is highly undesirableand in many cases impossible. Indeed, it is undesirable to sense theaggressing transmitter 110 output because doing so can distort thesignal transmitted from the antenna 140. In many applications, thesignal launched from the antenna 140 must adhere to strict regulatoryrequirements such as a spectral mask, and systems designers take greatsteps to do so. However, the addition of a sensor on the transmit pathcould significantly alter the properties of the transmitted signalcausing it to fail the requirements and thus necessitate a major,sometimes impractically laborious, redesign of the communicationssystem. Thus, the addition of the sensor near transmitter 110 canpreclude the active cancellation unit 130 from being added to anexisting communications device design to alleviate a previouslyunanticipated EMI problem. Furthermore, in many instances, theaggressing transmitter 110 is either unknown or not on the same deviceas the victim receiver 120 thus making sensing impossible. An example ofan unknown aggressing transmitter could be a high-speed bus or signaltrace that emits EMI. In modern communications systems, there are myriadsuch buses that can cause problematic EMI and identification of the oneor more offenders is impractical. Even if the offending EMI sourcescould be identified, it would likely be impractical to sense thembecause of routing complexities from the sensing point to the victimreceiver.

While not requiring explicit sensing of the aggressing transmitter, somemethods in the prior art still require prior coordination between theaggressing transmitter 110 and victim receiver 120. U.S. Pat. No.7,443,829 by Rizvi et al. for example only cancels uplink interferencein a CDMA based network. Such an approach is limited because it can onlycancel interference from other CDMA signals, i.e. it does not mitigateinterference from non-CDMA sources. Furthermore, among CDMA interferencesources, that approach only cancels those that are received at the samebasestation as the victim receiver. Such a cancellation technique isvery limited in the types of communications systems to which it canbenefit.

Another problem with methods for interference cancellation in the priorart pertains to those that require the aggressing transmitter 110 tohave prior knowledge of the carrier frequency of the victim receivesignal. Such an example of this is in U.S. Pat. No. 7,058,368 byNicholls and Roussel where they cancel the interference at the source ofthe aggressing transmitter 110 by suppressing transmit energy over aspecified bandwidth corresponding to the spectrum used by a victimreceiver 120. In order to do this however, the spectrum band used by thevictim receiver 120 must be known to the aggressing transmitter 110 inorder for the latter to suppress energy in the proper band. Requiringsuch knowledge is undesirable because in many situationsaggressor-victim pairs cannot be known ahead of time and are constantlychanging. In particular, a potential aggressor 110 may not be able toknow what victim radios 120 it will be aggressing. In fact, theaggressor 110 may not even be an explicit radio transmitter but mayinstead be a high-speed signal path or processor.

An additional problem with interference cancellation methods in theprior art relates to those that require modification of the aggressingtransmit signal. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,539,204 by Marsh andSutton, U.S. Pat. No. 6,745,018 by Zehavi et al., U.S. Pat. No.7,123,676 by Gebara et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,058,368 by Nicholls andRoussel propose the injection of a pilot or reference tone into thesignal transmitted in or near the aggressing transmitter 110. Thepresence of the pilot signal is then used at the victim receiver 120 toidentify the coupled aggressor signal 150 and guide the control of thecancellation unit 130 to maximize the degree of cancellation. Themodification of the aggressing transmit signal however has several majordrawbacks. First, modifying the aggressing transmit signal after theoutput of an aggressing transmitter 110 is likely to disturb the signalintegrity of the transmitted signal. Such degradation may come in theform of loss of valuable signal power or in terms of signal distortion.These degradations can be severe enough to cause the signal to violaterequired signal criteria such as those imposed by spectral masks. If,however, the modification to the aggressing transmit signal isincorporated in the aggressing transmitter itself, then such an approachrequires customized transmitters where the particular interferencecancellation technique, aggressing transmitter, and victim receiver areall designed in a coordinated fashion. Such high degrees ofcustomization are not practical for large scale adoption and the varietyof interference pairings that can be encountered. Another drawback ofmodifying the transmitted aggressor signal is that doing so requiresidentification of and physical access to the interference source. Aspreviously noted, in many contexts, the aggressing source is not knownor not on the same device as the victim receiver and thus not availablefor modification.

Besides injecting a reference pilot tone into the transmitted aggressorsignal prior to transmission over an antenna, a reference tone can beinjected after reception by the victim receiver. Such an approach ispromoted in U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,676 by Gebara et al. and U.S. Pat. No.7,058,368 by Nicholls and Roussel. However, in order for such anapproach to be effective, the victim receiver must use a pilot tonewhose frequency is congruous with the frequency of the transmittedaggressor. In other words, the victim receiver must know the operatingfrequency of the aggressing transmitter in order to accurately set thetone of the reference pilot to provide good guidance for cancellation.Unfortunately, in many cases, the identity of the aggressingtransmitter, and especially its operating frequency, is not known to thevictim receiver. Furthermore, as known to those skilled in the art, theact of injecting a tone, or any other signal, into the received victimpath can degrade the signal fidelity of the already weak and vulnerablereceived victim signal.

Avoiding the use of a pilot tone, an alternate approach for optimizingthe parameters in an interference cancellation unit is to have thevictim receiver 120 feed a signal fidelity measure back to thecancellation unit 130 to guide the adjustment of the cancellationparameters. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,915,112 by Sutton and Soledadeand U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,676 by Gebara et al. proposed the minimizationof a victim receiver's Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) measureto guide the control of the cancellation unit. Use of such a signal,external to the cancellation unit, has several drawbacks. First, such anapproach requires the delivery of the external fidelity measure from thereceiver 120 to the cancellation unit 130. Oftentimes, such a fidelitymeasure is not available externally from the receiver 120 for such use,and even in cases where it is available, making use of the signal can beburdensome due to the extra routing or processing resources needed.Second, indirect measures such as received power or RSSI are not alwaysindicative of interference power or lack thereof. For example, theamount of residual interference (after cancellation) may increase whilethe received victim power degrades due to a fading communicationschannel. In this case, the net result can be a decrease of totalreceived signal power or RSSI in which case the cancellation unit willbe misguided into believing that the amount of interference has beenreduced because the cancellation unit has no means of determining theindividual contributions of the received victim signal and theinterference signal to the total signal power or RSSI.

Besides the inappropriateness of general fidelity measures for thecontrol of an interference cancellation unit, many methods in the priorart propose the less than desirable optimization technique oftrial-and-error coordinate descent optimization. For example, U.S. Pat.No. 6,915,112 by Sutton and Soledade and U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,676 byGebara et al. propose to take a first fidelity measurement under a firstset of cancellation parameters followed by a second fidelity measurementunder a second set of parameters. Then, the set yielding the betterfidelity measure is selected as the better set. This trial-and-errorapproach can be repeated until some stopping criterion is met, or it canbe continued indefinitely. The drawback of trial-and-error coordinatedescent minimization is that the cancellation unit is always forced totest a parameter set which will have an unknown and perhaps worseperformance. It would be strongly preferred to use an optimizationtechnique, such as a gradient descent-based technique, where from asingle parameter set, one is able to determine how the parameters shouldbe modified to improve fidelity, i.e. without the testing of a secondset of parameters. It is well known to those skilled in the art ofcontrols theory that gradient descent-like techniques outperformtrial-and-error coordinate descent both in terms of resulting signalquality and the speed in which the optimum system parameters areachieved.

Some approaches in the prior art proposed to cancel signal interferenceon the baseband signal, i.e. after the signal has been modulated fromits RF carrier down to a low frequency or DC carrier and quantized by ananalog-to-digital converter (ADC). Such an approach is proposed in U.S.Pat. No. 6,539,204 by Marsh and Sutton, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,745,018 byZehavi et al. because of the sophisticated digital signal processingtechniques that can be used to remove interference. However, removinginterference at the baseband level has several major drawbacks. Such anapproach places extreme performance requirements on the front-endcircuitry components of the receiver. In particular, when a weakreceived victim is in the presence of a strong interferer, thedown-conversion mixer in the receiver will oftentimes further distortthe signal as nonlinearities are introduced due to practical limitationson circuit linearity. Furthermore, because the interference signal is somuch larger than the received victim signal, most of the dynamic rangeof the ADC is wasted to accommodate the large interferer. Thus, eithervery expensive high performance front-end circuit components arerequired or additional signal degradation is introduced. Thus, there isa need in the art for interference cancellation techniques that cancelthe interference early in the front-end of the receiver before thedown-conversion modulation or analog-to-digital conversion.

Accordingly, there is a need in the industry for systems, methods, andapparatuses for reducing interference at the front-end of acommunications device to address one or more of the above-describeddeficiencies or yet other deficiencies.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention may support reducing interference in areceived communications signal without any prior knowledge of, sensingof, or modification to source of the interference or its feed path to avictim receiver. An example approach may control the adjustableparameters of the interference cancellation via self-contained internalcontrol mechanisms requiring no direction from external sources forfidelity assessment or guidance. The example approach to interferencecancellation may also enable a compact, self-contained solution tointerference cancellation that is widely applicable and only requiresmodification to the front-end of a communications receiver.

According to an example embodiment of the invention, there is a methodof reducing interference in a received communications signal. The methodmay include the example steps of: receiving a first corruptedcommunications signal comprising at least two signal components thefirst being the desired received communications signal and the other(s)being one or more interferers not in the same frequency band as thefirst signal component; filtering the first corrupted signal with afirst filter providing an initial level of suppression of theinterferer(s); tapping off a small fraction (less than one half) ofpower of the first received corrupted signal prior to the firstfiltering to yield a second corrupted signal; applying a secondfiltering comprising a phase shift and amplification (includingattenuation by means of an amplification by less than one in magnitude)to the second corrupted signal to yield a correction signal; injectingthe correction signal after the output of the first filter to yield acompensated signal; adjusting the phase shift and amplification appliedin the second filtering to minimize the presence of the interference inthe compensated signal.

Embodiments of the invention may reduce interference at the front-end ofa communications receiver, thus reducing nonlinearity problems caused byhigh SNIR in down-converting mixers, ADCs, and other elements furtherdown the receiver processing chain. Furthermore, the embodiments of theinvention may not require any modification of, interaction with, orprior knowledge of the transmitting interferer.

In an example embodiment of the invention, the first filter can be oneof a SAW, FBAR, or BAW filter. Likewise, by placing the second filter inparallel with the first filter, a low-cost solution may be achieved. Inan alternative embodiment, the second filter can be embedded into amodule also housing the first filter. Accordingly, such embedding orintegration may reduce the component count and area occupied on acommunications receiver. In another example embodiment, the secondfilter can otherwise be embedded into a low-noise-amplifier (LNA). Sucha solution could likewise reduce the component count and area occupiedon a communications receiver.

In an alternative embodiment, the operation of injecting the correctionsignal after the output of the first rejection filtering can be done inan LNA. Such a solution could reduce the noise figure degradation fromthe injection and also reduce the component count and area occupied oncommunications receiver.

According to an example embodiment of the invention, the phase shiftapplied in the second filter can be adjusted by a method comprising theexample steps of: setting an adjustable phase shift element to a firstphase shift value; tapping off the output of the phase shift element togenerate a first phase reference signal; tapping off the signal pathanywhere between the output of the first filter and the input to theinjection point, inclusively, to generate a second phase referencesignal; comparing the two phase reference signals to generate a phasecorrection signal indicative of the phase mismatch between the tworeference signals; generating an updated phase shift value by modifyingthe first phase shift value in accordance with the value of the phasecorrection signal; replacing the first phase shift value with theupdated phase shift value; and repeating the steps using the newlyupdated phase shift value as the first phase shift value.

In an example embodiment of the invention, the phase shift correctionsignal may be generated from the first phase shift value and may notrequire testing of a second phase shift value for comparative purposesto derive the phase correction signal. This may enable embodiments ofthe invention to adapt quickly and precisely.

According to another example embodiment of the invention, a gain appliedin the second filter can be adjusted by a method comprising the stepsof: setting an adjustable gain element to a first gain value; tappingoff the input of the gain element to generate a first gain referencesignal; tapping off the compensated signal, i.e. the signal path afterthe output of the injection point, to generate a second gain referencesignal; comparing the two gain reference signals to generate a gaincorrection signal indicative of the amplitude mismatch between the tworeference signals; generating an updated gain value by modifying thefirst gain value in accordance with the value of the gain correctionsignal; replacing the first gain value with the updated gain value; andrepeating the steps using the newly updated gain value as the first gainvalue.

In an example embodiment of the invention, the gain correction signalmay be generated from the first gain value and may not require testingof a second gain value for comparative purposes to derive the gaincorrection signal. This may enable embodiments of the invention to adaptquickly and precisely.

In a example embodiment of the invention, the adjustable phase shiftblock or element precedes the adjustable gain block or element. In suchan arrangement, both of the phase reference signals may be unaffected bythe adjustable gain value. Accordingly, the phase shift and gain can beadapted simultaneously without conflicting feedback loops, therebyallowing for faster convergence of the phase and gain parameters.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will nowbe made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn toscale, and wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates a general context in which interference cancellationhas been applied in the conventional art.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a system that support interferencecancellation in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates the frequency response of various aspects of acommunications receiver, according to an example embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 4 illustrates an architecture for an example interferencecancellation device, according to an example embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 5 illustrates functional blocks comprising a phase shift controlblock, according to an example embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 illustrates functional blocks comprising a gain control block,according to an example embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention now will be described more fully hereinafter withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not allembodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, these inventions may beembodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limitedto the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments areprovided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legalrequirements. In other instances, well known methods, procedures,components, and circuits have not been described in detail. Like numbersrefer to like elements throughout.

Operating Environment Overview.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a system 200 that support interferencecancellation in accordance with an example embodiment of the invention.The system 200 may include a communications receiver 210 andinterference source 202. The interference source 202 may be one or moremechanisms for producing an interference signal, including, but notlimited to, a communications transmitter, processor, or integratedcircuit) that generates the underlying interference signal. Theinterference signal generated by the interference source 202 may beradiated by a radiating element 204 (e.g., an antenna, signal trace,conductive path, etc.) into a medium such as air, dielectric on acircuit board, or circuit substrate, thereby creating a coupled signal206. The coupled signal 206 may be undesirably picked up by a receiverantenna (or alternatively a signal trace in the receive signal path) 215and corrupts a received victim signal (e.g., a desired signal) that isintentionally picked by the receiver antenna 215. Both the receivedinterference and received victim signal may be delivered to thecommunications receiver 210 as a single, corrupted received signal. Inan alternative embodiment of the invention, radiating element 204 andantenna 215 may be implemented as a shared antenna between two or moreradio services operating at different carrier frequencies.

In accordance with an example embodiment of the invention, the receivedcorrupted signal may be processed according to a main receive path. Themain receive path may include a receiver (Rx) processor 260 thatdemodulates the received signal and performs baseband processing.However, the received corrupted signal may also be pre-processed in themain receive path with additional RF processing blocks (e.g., firstrejection filter 230 a, low-noise amplifier (LNA) 240, second rejectionfilter 230 b) shown in FIG. 2 to improve signal fidelity. In particular,a rejection filter 230 a may be utilized to suppress interferenceoutside the defined frequency band of the desired received signal. In anexample embodiment of the invention, the rejection filter 230 a may be anarrowband filter or a bandpass filter. The rejection filter 230 a maybe implemented as a surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter, a bulk acousticwave (BAW) filter, a film bulk acoustic wave resonator (FBAR) filter, aMicro-Electro-Mechanical systems (MEMs) filter, or a lumped elementfilter, according to an example embodiment of the invention. After theinitial rejection filtering by the rejection filter 230, the filteredsignal may be amplified with a low-noise amplifier (LNA) 240 to improvesignal strength and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) characteristics forsubsequent analog processing. It will be appreciated that LNA 240 can beincorporated into the receiver processor 260 rather than beingimplemented as a discrete device, according to an example embodiment ofthe invention. In strong interference environments such as inmulti-function mobile communications handsets, the communicationsreceiver 210 may also utilize a second rejection filter 230 b (foradditional out-of-band suppression) following the LNA 240, as therejection provided by the first rejection filter 230 a may not suppressenough of the interference by itself. The second rejection filter 230 bmay be one or more of a SAW, FBAR, BAW, or lumped element filter,according to an example embodiment of the invention.

In an example embodiment of the invention, an interference cancellationdevice 270 can additionally be provided in a path parallel to the mainreceive path discussed above. To provide the parallel path, a signal tap220 may be included on the main signal path prior to the input of thefirst rejection filtering 230 a. The signal tap 220 may be implementedusing a resister, an attenuator, splitter, capacitor, coupler, ordirectional coupler, according to an example embodiment of theinvention. The signal tap 220 may divert a small amount or portion(e.g., less than one half or another portion) of the received corruptedsignal power into an input of the interference cancellation device 270.The interference cancellation device 270 may then modify its inputsignal by applying an amplification (including attenuation as a specialcase by using an amplification factor of less than one in magnitude) andphase shift, as described herein. This modified signal may then beoutput by the interference cancellation device 270 as a correctionsignal and injected back into the main path via the combiner orsummation node 250. The combiner or summation node 250 takes as a firstinput, the correction signal output by the interference cancellationdevice 270, and as the second input, the main path signal at some pointafter the output of the first rejection filter 230 a, to produce acompensated victim signal with a reduced interference component, ascompared to the originally received corrupted receive signal.

It will be appreciated that the location of the combiner or summationnode 250 with respect to an optional LNA 240 may be varied withoutdeparting from example embodiments of the invention. For example, in oneexample embodiment of the invention, the combiner or summation node 250may be placed after the LNA 240 such that the second input of thecombiner or summation node 250 may be the amplified output of the LNA240. By applying LNA amplification prior to summation by combiner orsummation node 250, the noise figure of the front-end may be minimized,according to an example embodiment of the invention.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the combiner or summationnode 250 may be placed before the LNA 240 such that the second input ofthe summation node may be taken as the filtered output signal of thefirst rejection filter 230 a and the output of the combiner or summationnode 250 may be taken as the input to the LNA 240. According to thisembodiment, the LNA 240 input may have a higher signal-to-interferenceratio (SIR), thereby providing an opportunity to relax the linearityrequirements of the LNA 240.

In addition to splitting or tapping the received corrupted signal at asignal tap 220 prior to an input of the first rejection filter 230 a,the interference cancellation device 270 may also split or tap the mainpath signal at a signal tap 221 that is after the output of the firstrejection filter 230 a and prior to the second input of the combiner orsummation node 250. Furthermore, another signal tap 222 may be takenafter the output of the summation node and fed to the interferencecancellation device 270. As described herein, the signals from thesetaps 220, 221, 222 may be used by the interference cancellation device270 to control the adaptation of its adjustable phase shift andamplification settings. Like signal tap 220, signal taps 221 and 222 maydivert only a small amount or portion (e.g., less than one half oranother portion) of the signal power from the main path in order tominimally disturb the signal integrity of the main path signal. In anexample embodiment of the invention, the signal taps 221 and 222 may beimplemented using a resister, attenuator, splitter, capacitor, coupler,or directional coupler, according to an example embodiment of theinvention.

It will be appreciated that while the LNA 240 and second rejectionfilter 230 b are illustrated as part of the communications receiver 210in FIG. 2, they are optional and either or both can be omitted withoutdeparting from example embodiments of the invention. Indeed, withadequate interference cancellation, the use of the interferencecancellation device 270 may obviate the otherwise necessary secondrejection filter 230 b, thus enabling a less expensive and more compactsolution. Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the blocks in FIG. 2are listed to facilitate the operation of an embodiment of the inventionand need not be implemented as individual discrete devices. In anexample embodiment of the invention, an integrated circuit may compriseone or more of an LNA 240, interference cancellation device 270, signaltap 221, combiner or summation node 250, and signal tap 222. In analternative embodiment of the invention, a filtering module may becomprised of a rejection filter 230 a, and interference cancellationdevice 270. Indeed, one or more of the following elements may becombined into a single integrated circuit or module without departingfrom example embodiments of the invention: signal tap 220, rejectionfilter 230 a, LNA 240, signal tap 221, combiner or summation node 250,tap point 222, interference cancellation device 270, and receiverprocessor 260.

A high level operation of the example cancellation-enabled receiver 210of FIG. 2 may be understood with the simplified illustration in FIG. 3,where the simplified system 310 a comprises a representative firstrejection filter 230 a, signal tap 220, interference cancellation device270, and combiner or summation node 250. The first rejection filter 230a may be a narrow bandpass filter with passband gain “A” 320 a for thevictim signal and stopband gain “a” 330 a at interferer frequency f₀ 340with the value of “A” being much larger than the value of “a”. Theinterference cancellation device 270 applies a gain of “a′” 330 b thatapproximates “a” 330 a and with the opposite phase. The composite effectof system 310 a is then illustrated in the equivalent system 310 b whereseveral attributes may be observed. First because “A” 320 a is muchlarger than “a”′ 330 b, the difference in the composite passband “A-a′”320 b is approximately “A”, i.e. the passband response is largelypreserved. Second, because “a”′ 330 b approximates “a” 330 a, thedifference “a-a′” 330 c is approximately zero at the interfererfrequency f₀ 340 (but not necessarily elsewhere because the phase maynot match). In other words, the cancellation-enabled system 310 hashigher suppression at the interferer frequency than the first rejectionfilter 230 a alone. Furthermore, the operative frequency forcancellation can be varied by changing the gain and phase response ofthe interference cancellation device 270 to match those of the firstrejection filter 230 a at the operative interference frequency.

Interference Cancellation Device Architecture.

The ability of the cancellation-enabled receiver 210 to suppressinterference may be based at least in part on the ability of theinterference cancellation device 270 to match the gain and phaseresponse of the first rejection filter 230 a at the frequency of theinterference source 202. FIG. 4 shows an architecture for an exampleinterference cancellation device 270 to achieve such matching of thegain and phase response, according to an example embodiment of theinvention. In order to provide flexibility (e.g., for both interferertype and variation), the interference cancellation device 270 may use avariable phase shift block 410 and a variable gain amplifier (VGA) 450which can adapt to the interferer at hand, including the absence of aninterferer. In particular, the variable phase shift block 410 may becontrolled so that at the frequency of the interference signal, theoutput of phase shift block 410 is driven to either about 0 degreesin-phase (for in-phase synchronization) or about 180 degreesout-of-phase (for out-of-phase synchronization) with respect to thesecond input of the combiner or summation node 250 from the firstrejection filter 230 a. Consequently, the phase shift block 410 may bereferred to as a synchronizing phase shift block. It will be appreciatedthat the synchronizing phase shift block 410 may perform adaptive phaseadjustment using narrowband phase shifting by a phase shifter, a delayby a time-delay block, low-pass filtering by a low-pass filter, orband-pass filtering by a band-pass filter.

Following phase adjustment by the synchronizing phase shift block 410,gain adjustment may be performed by the VGA 450. More specially, the VGA450 may be adjusted so that its correction signal output, i.e. the firstinput to the combiner or summation node 250, maximally cancels theinterference signal in the second input to the combiner or summationnode 250. In particular, the VGA 450 may adjust the gain for maximumcancellation using a positive gain if phase shift block 410 produced anout-of-phase synchronization or a negative gain if the phase shift block410 produced an in-phase synchronization (e.g., so that the correctionsignal output can be effectively subtracted from the filtered main pathsignal).

The particular phase shift value used by the synchronizing phase block410 may be adaptively controlled by the phase shift control block 420.The phase shift control block 420 may take two phase reference signalsas inputs, as illustrated in FIG. 4. The first phase reference signalmay be taken from the output of the synchronizing phase shift block 410via a first phase reference tap 421. The second phase reference signalmay be taken as a tap off from the second input to the combiner orsummation node 250 (e.g., filtered main path signal) via a second phasereference tap 221. The phase shift control block 420 may then adjust thesynchronizing phase value (e.g., value of the phase shift) in thesynchronizing phase block 410 to align the first and second phasereference signals, i.e. the signal from taps 421 and 221, respectively.In the case where the received corrupted victim signal is impaired by astrong interferer, this interferer will dominate the characteristics ofthe first phase reference signal (from the output of synchronizing phaseblock 410), and hence, aligning the first and second phase referencesignals will largely correspond to aligning the phase shifted interferercomponents in the two signals, according to an example embodiment of theinvention.

The operational blocks of the phase shift control block 420 of FIG. 4are illustrated in more detail with reference to FIG. 5. To synchronizethe first phase reference signal from tap 421 with the second phasereference signal from tap 221, the first phase reference signal isinitially phase shifted with a calibration phase shift block 510 by acalibration phase shift value. The output of the calibration phase shiftblock 510 may then be mixed or multiplied by a first mixer 520 a withthe negative of the second phase reference signal from signal tap 221.The output of the first mixer 520 a may then be integrated oraccumulated by a first integrator 540 a (e.g., a lossy integrator). Theoutput of the first integrator 540 a (or equivalently a valueproportional to it) may be then taken as the phase shift value (whichmay also be referred to as the “synchronizing phase shift” value)applied by the synchronizing phase shift block 410. Such an examplecontrol loop may adjust the sum of the synchronizing phase shift value(for phase shift adjustment in block 410) and the calibrating phaseshift value (for phase shift adjustment in block 510) to be such thatthe output of the calibration phase shift block 510 may be orthogonal tothe second reference phase signal from the second phase reference tappoint 221. In other words, once the control loop has converged, thesignal output from the calibration phase shift block 510 may either beabout +90 degrees or about −90 degrees out of phase from the secondphase reference signal from tap point 221. Consequently, if the value ofthe calibrating phase shift in the calibrating phase shift block 510corresponds to an odd integer multiple of 90 degrees at the interferercarrier frequency (e.g. 90°, 270°, 450°, etc.), then the first phasereference signal from tap point 421 may be an integer multiple of 180degrees (e.g. 0°, 180°, 360°, etc.) out of phase with the second phasereference signal, as desired. In other words, the first and second phasereference signals may either be 0° in-phase or 180° out-of-phase witheach other when the output of the first integrator 540 a has converged.

It will be appreciated that the negation (or 180° phase shift) appliedon the second phase reference signal (from signal tap 221) input intothe first mixer 520 a can be applied anywhere along the processing chainwithout departing from example embodiments of the invention. Forexample, it can alternatively be applied on the input to the calibrationphase shift block 510, either input of the first mixer 520 a, or theinput or output of the first integrator 540 a. The negation may beperformed by a variety of means known in the art such as a negative gainin an amplifier, an inverter, an interchanging of lines in adifferential pair, or a negation calculation in a processor.

If the carrier frequency of the interferer is known and the value of thecalibrating phase shift can be precisely set, then the calibrating phaseshift (for block 510) can be fixed to a value corresponding to a 90°phase shift at the interferer frequency. However, this is not always thecase. In particular, the carrier frequency of the interferer may notalways be known by the system in advance and furthermore, it maydifficult to precisely set the value of the calibrating phase shift whensubject to realistic variations in the circuit fabrication process,supply voltage, and temperature. Thus, the calibrating phase shift block510 may be adaptive to automatically converge to a value correspondingto a 90 degree phase shift of the interferer.

An example embodiment of the phase shift control block 420 may include asecond control loop in the phase shift control block 420 to adapt thevalue of the calibrating phase shift in the calibration phase shiftblock 510. In particular, the first phase reference signal from tap 421may be negated and mixed or multiplied by a second mixer 520 with theoutput of the calibration phase shift block 510. The output of thesecond mixer 520 b may be integrated or accumulated by a secondintegrator 540 b. The output of the second integrator 540 b (orequivalently a value proportional to the output) is then taken as thevalue of the calibrating phase shift. Such a control loop may convergeto a state where the value of the calibrating phase shift corresponds toan odd integer multiple of 90 degrees. It will be appreciated that theconvergence behavior of the calibrating phase shift value may beindependent of any variation of (or lack thereof) the synchronizingphase shift value. Consequently, both the calibrating and synchronizingphase shift control loops can operate simultaneously, if desired.

It will be appreciated that the negation applied on the first phasereference signal input into the second mixer 520 b can be appliedanywhere along the processing chain without departing from exampleembodiments of the invention. For example, it can alternatively beapplied on the input to the calibration phase shift block 510, eitherinput of the second mixer 520 b, or the input or output of the secondintegrator 540 b, according to an example embodiment of the invention.The negation may be performed by a variety of means known in the artsuch as a negative gain in an amplifier, an inverter, an interchangingof lines in a differential pair, or a negation calculation in aprocessor.

In an example embodiment of the invention, the bandwidth requirements ofthe integrators 540 a, 540 b can be relaxed by the inclusion ofpreceding respective low-pass filters 530 a, 530 b on the output of therespective mixers 520 a, 520 b as shown in FIG. 5. Besides permitting asimpler design for the integrators 540 a, 540 b, the use of the low-passfilters 530 a, 530 b can also reduce fluctuations in the values of thesynchronizing and calibrating phase shifts.

Referring back to FIG. 4, the particular gain value used by the VGA 410may be adaptively controlled by the gain control block 460. The gaincontrol block 460 may takes two reference signals as inputs, asillustrated in FIG. 4. A first gain reference signal may be taken as atap from the output of the synchronizing phase shift block 410 via afirst gain reference tap 422. A second gain reference signal is taken asa tap from the output of the combiner or summation node 250 via a secondgain reference tap point 222. The gain control block 460 may then adjustthe gain value in the VGA 450 to decorrelate the first and second gainreference signals, i.e. to make the first and second gain referencesignals linearly independent. In other words, the VGA 450 gain may beadjusted so that the signal output from the synchronizing phase shiftblock 410 may maximally removed from the compensated signal at theoutput of the combiner or summation node 250.

The operational blocks of the gain control block 460 are described inmore detail with reference to FIG. 6. To decorrelate the first gainreference signal off of tap 422 from the second gain reference signaloff of signal tap 222, the first gain reference signal (from tap 422) isnegated and mixed or multiplied by a mixer 610 with the second gainreference signal (from signal tap 222). The output of the mixer 610 maythen be integrated or accumulated by an integrator 630. The output ofthe integrator 630 (or equivalently a value proportional to it) may thenbe taken as the gain value applied by the VGA 450. Such a control loopwill adjust the VGA gain to be such that the first and second gainreference signals are decorrelated.

It will be appreciated that the negation applied on the first gainreference signal input into the mixer 610 can be applied anywhere alongthe processing chain without departing from example embodiments of theinvention. For example, it can be applied on either input of the mixer610, or the input or output of the integrator 630, according to anexample embodiment of the invention. The negation may be performed by avariety of means known in the art such as a negative gain in anamplifier, an inverter, an interchanging of lines in a differentialpair, or a negation calculation in a processor.

In an example embodiment of the invention, the bandwidth requirements ofthe integrator 630 can be relaxed by the inclusion of a precedinglow-pass filter 620 on the output of the mixer 610 as shown in FIG. 6.Besides permitting a simpler design for the integrator 610, the use ofthe low-pass filter 620 may also reduce fluctuations in the value of theVGA gain.

In an example embodiment of the invention, the tap 421 for the firstphase reference and the tap 422 for the first gain reference may betaken after phase shift block 410 but prior to the VGA 450, asillustrated in FIG. 4. However, it will be appreciated that the order inwhich the first phase reference tap point 421 and first gain referencetap point 422 are taken is immaterial. For example, the first phasereference tap 421 may preceded or follow the first gain reference tap422. Furthermore, the first phase reference tap 421 may be taken off ofthe first gain reference line or similarly, the first gain reference tap422 may be taken off of the first phase reference line, according to anexample embodiment of the invention. As another alternative, a singletap point may be used for tapping both the first gain reference line andthe first phase reference line.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the first phase referencetap point 421 may be taken after the output of the gain block 450. Insuch a case, any phase response introduced by the gain block 450 may beincluded in the synchronization. However, doing so may also create thepossibility of coupling of the phase shift control and gain controlfeedback loops and may impair parameter convergence to the optimumvalues.

Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forthherein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which theseinventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is tobe understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specificembodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a genericand descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

That which is claimed:
 1. A method for reducing interference,comprising: receiving a corrupted receive signal comprising a receivedvictim signal component and an interference signal component; tapping orsplitting the corrupted receive signal into a main path signal and acancellation path signal; filtering the main path signal with arejection filter to generate a filtered main path signal; applying phaseadjustment and gain adjustment to the cancellation path signal togenerate a correction signal; and combining the filtered main pathsignal and the correction signal to generate a compensated signal, thecompensated signal having a reduced amount of the interference signalcomponent compared to the corrupted receive signal; wherein the appliedphase adjustment is configured based upon a first phase reference signaland a second phase reference signal, the first phase reference signalobtained from the cancellation path signal following the applied phaseadjustment, the second phase reference signal obtained from the filteredmain path signal; wherein the applied gain adjustment is configuredbased at least in part upon a first gain reference signal and a secondgain reference signal, the first gain reference signal obtained from thecancellation path signal, the second gain reference signal obtained fromthe compensated signal.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein thecompensated signal is delivered to a receiver for data decoding orreception.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the rejection filterincludes one or more of a narrowband filter or a bandpass filter.
 4. Themethod of claim 3, wherein the preliminary rejection filter is a surfaceacoustic wave (SAW) filter, a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filter, a filmbulk acoustic wave resonator (FBAR) filter, a Micro-Electro-Mechanicalsystems (MEMs) filter, or a lumped element filter.
 5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the phase adjustment is performed by one or more of anarrowband phase shifter, a time delay block, a low-pass filter, or aband-pass filter.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein first gain referencesignal is obtained from the cancellation path signal prior to applyingthe gain adjustment.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first gainreference signal is obtained from the cancellation path signalsubsequent to applying the gain adjustment.
 8. The method of claim 1,wherein the application of the phase adjustment precedes the applicationof the gain adjustment in the cancellation path.
 9. The method of claim1, wherein the phase adjustment is applied to the cancellation pathsignal to generate a phase-adjusted cancellation path signal, whereinthe gain adjustment is applied to the phase-adjusted cancellation pathsignal to generate the correction signal.
 10. The method of claim 1,wherein the first gain reference signal and the first phase referencesignal are a same signal.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein thefiltered main path signal is amplified by a low-noise amplifier (LNA)prior to combining the filtered main path signal and the correctionsignal, wherein second phase reference signal is obtained from an outputof the LNA.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein a summation node is usedto combine the filtered main path signal and the correction signal,wherein the summation node is incorporated into a low-noise amplifier(LNA) or the rejection filter.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein thetapping or splitting of the corrupted received signal is performed by anintegrated module containing the rejection filter.
 14. A system forreducing interference, comprising: a signal tap that splits or taps acorrupted receive signal into a main path signal and a cancellation pathsignal; a rejection filter that filters the main path signal to generatea filtered main path signal; an interference cancellation block thatapplies phase adjustment and gain adjustment to the cancellation pathsignal to generate a correction signal; and a summation node thatcombines the filtered main path signal and the correction signal togenerate a compensated signal, the compensated signal having a reducedamount of an interference signal compared to the corrupted receivesignal, wherein the applied phase adjustment is configured based upon afirst phase reference signal and a second phase reference signal, thefirst phase reference signal obtained from the cancellation path signalfollowing the applied phase adjustment, the second phase referencesignal obtained from the filtered main path signal, wherein the appliedgain adjustment is configured based at least in part upon a first gainreference signal and a second gain reference signal, the first gainreference signal obtained from the cancellation path signal, the secondgain reference signal obtained from the compensated signal.
 15. Thesystem of claim 14, wherein the rejection filter includes one or more ofa narrowband filter or a bandpass filter.
 16. The system of claim 14,wherein the interference cancellation block includes a variable phaseshift block for applying the phase adjustment, and a variable gainamplifier (VGA) for applying the gain adjustment, wherein the first gainreference signal is obtained from either an input of the variable gainamplifier or an output of the variable gain amplifier.
 17. The system ofclaim 14, wherein the interference cancellation block includes avariable phase shift block for applying the phase adjustment, and avariable gain amplifier (VGA) for applying the gain adjustment, whereinthe phase adjustment is applied by the variable phase shift block to thecancellation path signal to generate a phase-adjusted cancellation pathsignal, and wherein the gain adjustment is applied by the VGA to thephase-adjusted cancellation path signal to generate the correctionsignal.
 18. The system of claim 14, further comprising: a low-noiseamplifier (LNA) that amplifies the filtered main path signal to generatean amplified main path signal, wherein the amplified main path signal iscombined with the correction signal by the summation node to generatethe compensated signal, wherein the second phase reference signal isobtained from an output of the LNA.
 19. The system of claim 14, whereinthe summation node is incorporated into a low-noise amplifier (LNA) orthe rejection filter.
 20. The system of claim 14, wherein an integratedmodule includes both the tap and the rejection filter.